Behavior is probabilistic
You need ranges, thresholds, and eval sets instead of assuming every run should match one exact output.
Testing AI Systems
AI-based products change the testing job because output quality depends on data, prompts, retrieval, model behavior, and guardrails working together. The goal is not perfect certainty. It is explicit risk control.
What changes
Many familiar QA skills still apply. The difference is that your test strategy now has to account for behavior ranges, incomplete certainty, and model-specific risks. The next three pages most teams need are the evals guide, the RAG testing guide, and the risk-and-guardrails guide.
You need ranges, thresholds, and eval sets instead of assuming every run should match one exact output.
Training data, retrieval context, and live inputs can all change outcomes, so data checks become part of the test strategy.
Test not just helpfulness, but safety boundaries, policy behavior, refusals, and fallback behavior when the model should not answer.
AI systems need instrumentation after release so teams can catch drift, regressions, and bad edge-case behavior that evals missed.
Featured guides
A practical guide to designing evals for LLM features, choosing metrics, and turning fuzzy quality goals into repeatable checks.
How to test retrieval-augmented generation systems for grounding, relevance, safety, fallback behavior, and freshness.
A practical map of AI-specific risks and the guardrails testers can help teams define, verify, and monitor.
Short answers about testing LLMs, AI features, RAG systems, evals, drift, safety, and production monitoring.